Comments on: Google Lively Review

By: Shannon

Shannon — Tue, 30 Sep 2008 13:34:02 +0000

Lively is such a rip-off of IMVU.

By: Lively o Second Life killer? | bernabauer.com

Lively o Second Life killer? | bernabauer.com — Tue, 23 Sep 2008 11:57:32 +0000

[...] até acha a idéia interessante, mas hoje é uma ferramenta de chat para jovens entediados. E no blog do josé gomez (é um qualquer da internet, ninguém muito importante) dá pra ver o por que ninguém gostou. Ele [...]

By: name

name — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:02:31 +0000

Hello!,

By: name

name — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 02:02:11 +0000

Good day!,

By: rayq

rayq — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 04:46:23 +0000

I tried it and i think its a little bit too much of a cartoon for me. Ticket4one has a similar thing but atlaest i can see real people from the 3D Virtual Chat Rooms

By: Lively 3D chat .. so what? « Mariis Mills

Lively 3D chat .. so what? « Mariis Mills — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 10:28:27 +0000

[...] notes Lively may be more of a social networking 3D space as opposed to a 3D world. But then as Jose C. Gomez states in his review for now Lively may be just another application bugging down the Internet [...]

By: Google Takes on Second Life and the Sims With Lively | Your Game Blog

Google Takes on Second Life and the Sims With Lively | Your Game Blog — Wed, 16 Jul 2008 00:31:01 +0000

[...] it’s Windows only. (Mac and Linux clients are on their way.) Jose Gormez has an interesting review (via Slashdot). In it he notes that porn has already made it was into Lively. The fact that Lively [...]

By: The Slash dot effect | josecgomez.com

The Slash dot effect | josecgomez.com — Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:29:43 +0000

[...] Google Lively Review [...]

By: THE SMALL BUSINESS BLOG » Blog Archive » Small Business Technology Round-Up - 12/07/2008

Sun, 13 Jul 2008 20:58:01 +0000

[...] Google Lively Review – Google’s answer to ‘Second Life’ has launched [...]

By: JB

JB — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 23:38:28 +0000

Actually, Google content filters CAN be turned off. Not everything sexually explicit is porn which is why this is a good feature to have.

The decision to filter explicit material isn’t neccessarilly a value judgement on it anyways and google has no age verification to turn off its filters. It is a pragmatic decision which engances the results of most searches in most circumstances.

I think Google lifely needs the same approach so that explicit content is quietly filtered by default unless a user that knows what they are getting into disables it.